Thursday, January 26, 2012

Reader stars 'n' interesting links

Seems like this is becoming a regular feature for those things I found interesting....but not interesting enough to make a dedicated post.
  • Project High Jump Boosted Dart - High Power Rocketry (Discussion, photos, video...CATO.)
  • Nuclear Katyusha Launching - Next Big Future (NBF reviews his proposal for a one pulse, Orion-style nuclear powered rocket.  It would be constructed in, and launched from, a 3.5km deep hole in a salt dome.  A 150kT nuclear bomb would accelerate the ship to escape velocity.  Interesting, but not likely to ever happen. " Launch people and delicates the regular way. ")
  • NASA Aerospace Advisory Panel's annual report - RLV and Space Transport (Evidently the NASA safety bureaucracy  isn't happy with the Commercial Crew Program.  Clark points our that both the Atlas V and Falcon 9 will have dozens of flights under their belt before a human climbs aboard.  Unlike the Shuttle or SLS.)
  • Project Bifrost: Return to Nuclear Rocketry - Centauri Dreams (Sounds like another study on the state of nuclear rocketry today; building on Project NERVA, which was finally canceled in 1972.  The question remains whether we as a society are ready for nuclear powered rockets.)
  • Dale Windsor is rumbling about bringing back LawnDart Rocketry.  Note the new URL as Sunward bought his old one after it lapsed:  http://www.lawndartrocketry.info/. He says, "Lots of new stuff in the pipeline (can you say X-planes?), though I'm reluctant to make any announcements."

2 comments:

  1. The nuclear explosion in a tube will not work for a spacecraft unless it is made out of solid metal. 0 - 8km/sec in 2.5 KM is like the Hibex rocket. It would be destroyed most likely. This is based perhaps on the supposed nuclear test where the well cap was shot into space. Sadly, that never occurred and it is utterly fiction.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, what you're saying fits with my post...anything but solid metal is 'delicates' :)

    ReplyDelete